Home/Services/Health Technology Management Htm Lifecycle Consulting/Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service in Zambia
Verified Service Provider in Zambia
Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service in Zambia
Engineering Excellence & Technical Support
Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service High-standard technical execution following OEM protocols and local regulatory frameworks.
Objective Technical Compliance Scoring
Our service provides impartial, data-driven scoring of bid technical proposals against pre-defined evaluation criteria, ensuring transparency and fairness in the assessment process in Zambia.
Rigorous Adherence to Tender Specifications
We meticulously analyze bids to verify full compliance with all technical requirements, specifications, and standards stipulated in Zambian procurement regulations and tender documents.
Actionable Technical Evaluation Insights
Gain deep insights into the strengths and weaknesses of competing technical proposals, enabling informed decision-making and the selection of the most suitable and capable bidder for your Zambian projects.
What Is Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service In Zambia?
Bid evaluation and technical compliance scoring services in Zambia are crucial processes employed by public and private sector entities to objectively assess and rank proposals submitted in response to tenders or requests for proposals (RFPs). This service ensures that bidders meet the specified technical requirements, demonstrate the necessary capabilities, and offer solutions that align with the procuring entity's objectives. The core of this service involves a systematic methodology for evaluating the technical aspects of each bid, culminating in a quantifiable score that informs the subsequent financial evaluation and ultimate award decision. This process is vital for ensuring fairness, transparency, and value for money in procurement.
| Who Needs It? | Typical Use Cases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government Ministries and Agencies: Responsible for public procurement of goods, services, and works across all sectors (e.g., infrastructure, healthcare, education, defense). | Parastatal Organizations: State-owned enterprises procuring for their operational needs and development projects. | Local Government Authorities: Municipalities and councils tendering for community development projects, infrastructure maintenance, and service provision. | International Organizations and NGOs Operating in Zambia: When conducting procurements that adhere to national or their own organizational procurement standards. | Large Private Sector Corporations: Particularly those involved in complex projects, capital expenditures, or regulated industries where due diligence and objective assessment are paramount. | Development Finance Institutions (DFIs): Providing funding for projects in Zambia that require adherence to strict procurement guidelines. |
| Procurement of Complex Technical Services: IT solutions, engineering design, consultancy services, specialized maintenance, and research and development. | Construction and Infrastructure Projects: Evaluation of building methodologies, materials, project management plans, and contractor experience. | Acquisition of Specialized Equipment and Technology: Assessing the technical specifications, performance capabilities, and compatibility of machinery, vehicles, or advanced systems. | Outsourcing of Critical Business Functions: Evaluating proposals for managed services, logistics, or shared services. | Grant and Funding Applications: Assessing the technical viability and compliance of proposals seeking grants or funding. | Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Evaluating technical proposals for projects involving collaboration between government and private entities. |
What This Service Involves:
- Establishment of Evaluation Criteria: Defining clear, measurable, and objective technical evaluation criteria aligned with the RFP/tender specifications. This includes technical specifications, methodology, experience, capacity, proposed personnel, quality assurance plans, and risk mitigation strategies.
- Document Review and Verification: Thorough examination of submitted bid documents to confirm adherence to all mandatory technical requirements, specifications, and formatting guidelines.
- Technical Scoring: Assigning scores to each criterion based on the bidder's documented response, often utilizing a pre-defined scoring matrix (e.g., points-based systems, qualitative scales).
- Compliance Assessment: Identifying any deviations, exceptions, or non-compliance with technical requirements, and assessing their materiality and impact.
- Clarification Processes: Facilitating communication with bidders to seek clarification on technical aspects of their proposals, if permissible by procurement regulations.
- Technical Evaluation Report Generation: Compiling a comprehensive report detailing the evaluation process, scoring, identified strengths and weaknesses of each bid, and conclusions regarding technical compliance and merit.
- Recommendation for Proceeding: Recommending which bids have successfully passed the technical evaluation and are eligible for further evaluation (e.g., financial evaluation) or direct award based on technical merit.
Who Needs Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service In Zambia?
In Zambia, organizations across various sectors are increasingly recognizing the critical need for robust bid evaluation and technical compliance scoring services. These services are not just a procedural formality; they are essential for ensuring transparency, fairness, value for money, and ultimately, the successful execution of projects and procurement initiatives. Without them, organizations risk financial waste, project delays, substandard outcomes, and potential reputational damage.
| Target Customer/Sector | Key Departments/Individuals Involved | Why They Need the Service |
|---|---|---|
| Government Ministries and Agencies | Procurement Departments, Technical Units (e.g., Engineering, IT, Health), Legal Departments, Finance Departments, Project Management Offices (PMOs) | To ensure transparent and fair procurement processes for public funds, adhere to public procurement regulations, achieve value for money, and select technically capable suppliers for critical national projects. |
| Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) | Procurement & Contracts, Engineering & Operations, Finance, Project Management Teams | To manage large-scale procurement for infrastructure, equipment, and services, ensuring operational efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and compliance with regulatory frameworks. |
| Local Government Authorities | Procurement Units, Engineering Services, Finance Departments, Planning Departments | To procure services and infrastructure for local communities (e.g., roads, water, sanitation, public buildings), ensuring accountability and responsiveness to citizen needs. |
| International Development Organizations (e.g., World Bank, UN Agencies, USAID) | Procurement Units, Project Management Teams, Technical Specialists | To ensure their funded projects in Zambia are implemented efficiently and effectively by selecting qualified vendors and contractors, adhering to international procurement standards and donor requirements. |
| Large Private Sector Corporations | Procurement & Supply Chain, Engineering, IT, Operations, Project Management Offices, Legal & Compliance | To secure high-quality goods, services, and complex solutions (e.g., IT systems, large machinery, construction contracts) at competitive prices, mitigating risks and ensuring project success. |
| Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) | Procurement Officers, Program Managers, Finance & Administration | To procure essential resources, equipment, and services for their projects (e.g., health supplies, educational materials, construction for facilities), ensuring efficient use of donor funds and impactful program delivery. |
| Financial Institutions (Banks, Insurance Companies) | Procurement Departments, IT Departments, Facilities Management, Risk Management | To acquire critical services and technology (e.g., core banking systems, security infrastructure, office supplies, outsourced services) ensuring reliability, security, and compliance with financial regulations. |
| Telecommunications Companies | Procurement Teams, Network Engineering, IT Infrastructure, Project Management | To procure complex network equipment, software, and infrastructure development services, requiring rigorous technical evaluation to ensure service quality, reliability, and scalability. |
| Mining and Extractive Industries | Procurement & Supply Chain, Engineering & Technical Services, Operations, Health & Safety | To procure specialized heavy machinery, equipment, and technical services for exploration and production, demanding strict adherence to safety and operational standards. |
| Construction and Infrastructure Companies | Procurement Departments, Project Managers, Technical Directors, Contracts Management | To select subcontractors, suppliers for materials, and consultants for complex construction and infrastructure projects, ensuring quality, timely delivery, and adherence to project specifications. |
| Energy and Utilities Providers | Procurement & Contracts, Engineering Departments, Operations & Maintenance, Finance | To procure power generation equipment, transmission infrastructure, maintenance services, and technological solutions, requiring in-depth technical understanding and risk assessment. |
| Healthcare Providers (Hospitals, Clinics) | Procurement Departments, Medical Equipment Specialists, Pharmacy, Administration | To acquire medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and specialized healthcare services, ensuring patient safety, compliance with health regulations, and efficient resource allocation. |
| Educational Institutions (Universities, Colleges) | Procurement Offices, IT Departments, Estates Management, Academic Faculties | To procure educational technology, laboratory equipment, research tools, and facility maintenance services, supporting academic and research objectives. |
Who Needs Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service in Zambia?
- Government Ministries and Agencies
- Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)
- Local Government Authorities
- International Development Organizations
- Large Private Sector Corporations
- Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
- Financial Institutions
- Telecommunications Companies
- Mining and Extractive Industries
- Construction and Infrastructure Companies
- Energy and Utilities Providers
- Healthcare Providers
- Educational Institutions
Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service Process In Zambia
This document outlines the typical workflow for a Bid Evaluation and Technical Compliance Scoring Service in Zambia, from the initial client inquiry to the final execution of the service. The process is designed to ensure objectivity, fairness, and adherence to tender specifications. The service is crucial for organizations, particularly government bodies and large private enterprises, seeking to procure goods, services, or works through competitive bidding processes.
| Phase | Key Activities | Description | Deliverables/Outcomes | Key Stakeholders Involved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Contact, Needs Assessment, Service Understanding | Prospective client contacts the service provider to understand the scope, benefits, and process of bid evaluation and technical compliance scoring. Detailed discussion on the client's specific needs and tender context. | Understanding of client requirements, preliminary service outline. | Client (Procurement Officer, Project Manager), Service Provider (Business Development Manager, Consultant) |
| Proposal Development, Quotation, Contract Negotiation, Signing | Based on the defined scope, the service provider develops a detailed proposal outlining the methodology, timelines, team, and fees. Upon acceptance, a formal service agreement or contract is negotiated and signed. | Formal Proposal, Service Agreement/Contract. | Client (Procurement Officer, Legal Department), Service Provider (Management, Legal Department) |
| Market Research, Vendor Registration, Pre-qualification Review | If the client has not identified bidders, the service provider may assist in market research or managing the pre-qualification process to ensure only capable bidders are invited. If pre-qualification is part of the tender, the service provider reviews submitted pre-qualification documents against defined criteria. | List of eligible bidders, Pre-qualification report (if applicable). | Client (Procurement Department), Service Provider (Evaluation Team), Potential Bidders |
| Analysis of Tender Documents, Development of Evaluation Matrix | The service provider thoroughly reviews the client's tender documents (RFP, RFQ, etc.) to understand the technical requirements, scope of work, and evaluation criteria. A detailed technical compliance scoring matrix is developed, aligned with the tender specifications and client's priorities. | Technical Evaluation Matrix, Scoring Guidelines, Evaluation Plan. | Client (Technical Experts, Procurement Officers), Service Provider (Lead Evaluator, Technical Specialists) |
| Receiving Bids, Secure Storage, Formal Opening | Bids are received by the client or a designated secure channel. The service provider may witness or oversee the formal bid opening process to ensure transparency and adherence to procedures. | Record of received bids, Minutes of bid opening. | Client (Procurement Committee, Witness), Service Provider (Observer, Evaluator) |
| Detailed Review of Technical Proposals, Application of Scoring Matrix | The evaluation team, comprising subject matter experts, meticulously reviews each bidder's technical proposal against the pre-defined scoring matrix. This involves assessing compliance with specifications, methodologies, team qualifications, experience, and proposed solutions. | Scored technical proposals, Individual evaluator scoring sheets. | Service Provider (Evaluation Team), Client (Reviewers, Approvers) |
| Seeking Clarifications, Conducting Site Inspections | If ambiguities or missing information arise during the technical evaluation, the service provider, in coordination with the client, may seek clarifications from bidders. Site visits to bidder facilities or project sites may also be conducted to verify information. | Clarification responses from bidders, Site visit reports. | Service Provider (Evaluation Team), Client (Technical Experts), Bidders |
| Opening & Review of Financial Proposals, Price Analysis (if applicable) | Once the technical evaluation is complete and compliant bidders are identified, the financial proposals are opened. The service provider may be involved in reviewing financial proposals for completeness and compliance, and potentially conducting price analysis if specified. | Opened financial proposals, Preliminary financial analysis report (if applicable). | Client (Finance Department, Procurement Department), Service Provider (Financial Analyst, Observer) |
| Consolidation of Scores, Generation of Evaluation Report, Recommendation | All evaluation findings are consolidated. A comprehensive technical evaluation report is prepared, detailing the scoring, justifications, and identification of technically compliant bidders. This report forms the basis for the client's final decision or award, often including a recommendation for the preferred bidder(s). | Technical Evaluation Report, Scoring Summary, Recommendation Report. | Service Provider (Lead Evaluator, Project Manager), Client (Procurement Committee, Decision Makers) |
| Bid Protest Handling, Contract Finalization Support, Debriefing | The service provider may offer support during the post-evaluation phase, including assisting the client in responding to bidder queries, handling any bid protests, and providing input during contract finalization. Bidder debriefing may also be facilitated. | Response to queries, Support for protest resolution, Input for contract negotiation, Debriefing assistance. | Service Provider (Consultants), Client (Procurement Department), Bidders |
Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service Process Workflow
- Inquiry & Scope Definition
- Proposal & Agreement
- Bidder Identification & Pre-qualification (if applicable)
- Tender Document Review & Criteria Development
- Bid Receipt & Opening
- Technical Compliance Scoring
- Clarification & Site Visits (if applicable)
- Financial Bid Evaluation
- Recommendation & Reporting
- Post-Evaluation Support
Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service Cost In Zambia
Evaluating bids and ensuring technical compliance is a critical step in procurement processes across various sectors in Zambia. The cost of these services can vary significantly based on several factors. These services are typically provided by specialized consultants, engineering firms, or dedicated procurement agencies. The complexity of the project, the number of bids to evaluate, the level of technical detail required, and the urgency of the evaluation all play a role in determining the final cost. Smaller, simpler projects with fewer bids might be charged a flat fee or an hourly rate, while larger, more complex projects often involve a percentage of the contract value or a detailed project-based quotation.
| Service Type | Typical Pricing Model | Estimated Cost Range (ZMW - Zambian Kwacha) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small to Medium Projects (e.g., standard office equipment, minor construction) | Flat Fee or Hourly Rate | 5,000 - 25,000 ZMW | Depends on the number of bids and specific technical requirements. |
| Large-Scale Projects (e.g., infrastructure development, major industrial equipment) | Percentage of Contract Value or Project-Based Quote | 1% - 5% of Contract Value (or custom quote) | Often involves a significant team of specialists. Minimum fees may apply for custom quotes. |
| Specialized Technical Reviews (e.g., advanced engineering, IT systems) | Hourly Rate or Project-Based Quote | 500 - 2,500 ZMW per hour / Custom Quote | Reflects the high demand for niche expertise. Can escalate quickly with extensive review needs. |
| Standard Bid Evaluation & Scoring (without extensive technical scrutiny) | Flat Fee | 3,000 - 15,000 ZMW | Covers routine compliance checks and scoring against predefined criteria. |
Key Pricing Factors for Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Services in Zambia
- {"title":"Project Complexity and Scope","description":"The more technical and intricate the project, the higher the expertise and time required for evaluation, leading to increased costs. This includes the complexity of the goods, works, or services being procured."}
- {"title":"Number of Bids Received","description":"Evaluating a larger volume of bids generally translates to more administrative work and expert time, thus increasing the overall service cost."}
- Level of Technical Detail Required
- Urgency of the Evaluation
- Consultant/Firm Expertise and Reputation
- Geographical Location (within Zambia)
- Associated Travel and Logistics Costs
- Reporting Requirements and Deliverables
Affordable Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service Options
Securing the best value in procurement hinges on a robust and efficient bid evaluation process. This service focuses on providing cost-effective solutions for both technical compliance scoring and overall bid evaluation, ensuring fairness, transparency, and strategic advantage. We understand that resources are often constrained, and our offerings are designed to maximize your return on investment by streamlining these critical stages of the procurement lifecycle. Value bundles and tailored cost-saving strategies are at the core of our service delivery, allowing you to select the level of support that best fits your needs and budget.
| Value Bundle | Inclusions | Key Benefits | Estimated Cost Savings Potential |
|---|---|---|---|
Key Service Offerings & Value Propositions
- {"title":"Technical Compliance Scoring","description":"Objective and standardized assessment of bids against predefined technical criteria. Reduces subjectivity and ensures all proposals are evaluated on a level playing field. Key benefits include increased fairness, improved vendor selection accuracy, and reduced risk of disputes."}
- {"title":"Comprehensive Bid Evaluation","description":"Extends beyond technical compliance to include commercial, financial, and qualitative aspects. Provides a holistic view for informed decision-making. Benefits include optimal cost-benefit analysis, identification of innovative solutions, and alignment with strategic objectives."}
- {"title":"Customizable Evaluation Frameworks","description":"Development of bespoke scoring models and criteria tailored to your specific project requirements, industry standards, and organizational priorities. Ensures relevance and maximizes the effectiveness of the evaluation process."}
- {"title":"Technology-Assisted Evaluation","description":"Leveraging specialized software and AI tools to accelerate the scoring and analysis process, improve accuracy, and provide insightful data. Drives efficiency and reduces manual effort."}
- {"title":"Expert Evaluation Panel Support","description":"Providing access to experienced procurement professionals and subject matter experts to assist your internal evaluation teams. Enhances the quality and depth of the evaluation."}
Verified Providers In Zambia
In Zambia, ensuring access to reliable and high-quality healthcare is paramount. This is where the concept of 'Verified Providers' becomes crucial. Verified Providers are healthcare professionals and institutions that have met stringent standards and undergone thorough vetting processes to guarantee their competence, ethical practices, and adherence to regulatory requirements. Franance Health stands out as a leader in this domain, dedicating itself to identifying and promoting such verified providers. Their credentialing process is designed to be comprehensive, examining not only the qualifications and experience of practitioners but also the operational integrity and patient care standards of facilities. Choosing a Franance Health-verified provider means entrusting your well-being to individuals and organizations that have demonstrably proven their commitment to excellence and patient safety, making them the superior choice for your healthcare needs in Zambia.
| Criteria for Verification | Franance Health's Approach | Benefit to Patients |
|---|---|---|
| Professional Qualifications & Licensing | Thorough verification of all degrees, certifications, and active licenses with relevant Zambian regulatory bodies. | Ensures practitioners are legally qualified and possess the necessary skills. |
| Clinical Experience & Specialization | Detailed review of past work experience, surgical logs, and areas of specialization. | Guarantees access to experienced professionals in specific medical fields. |
| Reputation & Patient Feedback | Collection and analysis of patient reviews, testimonials, and any disciplinary records. | Provides insight into a provider's bedside manner and patient satisfaction. |
| Facility Standards & Equipment | Assessment of clinic/hospital infrastructure, hygiene protocols, and availability of essential medical equipment. | Confirms a safe and well-equipped environment for treatment. |
| Ethical Conduct & Professionalism | Background checks and adherence to a strict code of ethics. | Assures that care is delivered with integrity and respect. |
Why Franance Health Verified Providers are the Best Choice:
- Rigorous Credentialing Process
- Commitment to Patient Safety
- Ensured Competence and Expertise
- Adherence to Ethical Standards
- Access to Reliable Healthcare Networks
- Peace of Mind for Patients
- Promotion of Healthcare Excellence
Scope Of Work For Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service
This Scope of Work (SOW) outlines the services required for the evaluation of bids received for the [Project Name/Procurement Reference] and the subsequent technical compliance scoring. The service provider will be responsible for conducting a thorough and objective assessment of all submitted proposals against the defined technical requirements and criteria. This will ensure a fair and transparent selection process for the successful bidder.
| Task | Description | Deliverables | Standard Specifications/Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thorough review of all issued tender documents, including the Request for Proposal (RFP), technical specifications, statement of work, and evaluation criteria. | Understanding of all project requirements and evaluation parameters. | Completeness and clarity of understanding documented via a Q&A log or initial briefing session. |
| Creation of a detailed technical evaluation framework and scoring methodology based on the RFP requirements. | Technical evaluation matrix/scorecard with clearly defined scoring scales and weighting for each criterion. | Alignment with RFP technical requirements, industry best practices, and fairness principles. |
| Preliminary review of all submitted technical proposals to identify completeness and adherence to basic formatting and submission requirements. | List of technically complete bids eligible for detailed evaluation. | Adherence to submission guidelines and mandatory technical requirements specified in the RFP. |
| In-depth assessment of each technically complete proposal against the established evaluation framework and criteria. This includes: - Evaluation of proposed solution/methodology. - Assessment of technical capabilities and experience. - Review of proposed resources and team structure. - Verification of compliance with technical specifications and performance requirements. - Identification of any technical risks or ambiguities. | Completed technical evaluation scorecards for each bidder. | Objectivity, consistency, and thoroughness in applying scoring criteria. Evidence of cross-referencing with RFP documents. Detailed notes and justifications for each score awarded. |
| Assignment of a quantitative technical compliance score to each bidder based on the detailed evaluation. | Final technical compliance scores for all evaluated bids. | Clear and auditable scoring process. Scores reflect the degree of compliance with all mandatory and desirable technical requirements. |
| Systematic identification and documentation of any technical deviations, exceptions, or proposed alternatives from the RFP requirements within each bid. | List of all identified technical deviations with an assessment of their impact and acceptability. | Clarity of documentation. Assessment of impact based on project criticality and potential risks. |
| Facilitation of technical clarification requests to bidders based on ambiguities or missing information identified during the evaluation. | Responses to bidder queries and updated evaluation based on clarification received. | Timely and professional communication with bidders. Ensure clarification does not alter the fundamental scope of the original proposal. |
| Compilation of a comprehensive report summarizing the technical evaluation process, findings, compliance scores, and recommendations. | Final Technical Evaluation Report including an executive summary, detailed evaluation of each bidder, comparison of technical aspects, list of deviations, and overall technical assessment. | Clarity, accuracy, and completeness of the report. Objective presentation of findings. Recommendations aligned with the evaluation results and project objectives. |
Key Objectives
- To objectively evaluate the technical proposals submitted by potential vendors.
- To determine the level of technical compliance of each bid against the specified requirements.
- To provide a detailed technical compliance score for each bidder.
- To identify any technical deviations or non-compliance issues.
- To produce a comprehensive report summarizing the evaluation findings.
Service Level Agreement For Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service
This Service Level Agreement (SLA) defines the service levels, response times, and uptime guarantees for the Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service (hereinafter referred to as "the Service"). This SLA is entered into between [Your Company Name/Provider Name] (hereinafter referred to as "Provider") and [Client Company Name] (hereinafter referred to as "Client").
| Service Component | Response Time Target | Uptime Guarantee | Definition of Downtime | Remedy for Failure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bid submission and intake processing | Within 5 minutes of successful submission | 99.5% Monthly Uptime | Service is unavailable or inaccessible to the Client, preventing bid submissions or access to existing submissions. | Service Credit equivalent to 5% of monthly service fee for each full 30-minute interval of Unplanned Downtime exceeding 1 hour per month. |
| Automated technical compliance checks | Within 10 minutes of bid intake completion | 99.7% Monthly Uptime | Automated compliance checks fail to execute or produce erroneous results, impacting the initial scoring. | Service Credit equivalent to 7% of monthly service fee for each full 30-minute interval of Unplanned Downtime exceeding 1 hour per month. |
| Manual review and scoring interface access | Within 15 minutes of request initiation | 99.8% Monthly Uptime | The manual review and scoring interface is inaccessible or unresponsive, preventing evaluators from performing their tasks. | Service Credit equivalent to 10% of monthly service fee for each full 30-minute interval of Unplanned Downtime exceeding 30 minutes per month. |
| Generation of compliance scores and reports | Within 30 minutes of manual scoring completion | 99.7% Monthly Uptime | The system fails to generate or deliver accurate compliance scores and reports as per the agreed format and schedule. | Service Credit equivalent to 7% of monthly service fee for each full 30-minute interval of Unplanned Downtime exceeding 1 hour per month. |
| Secure storage and access to bid documentation | 99.9% Monthly Uptime | Access to stored bid documentation is denied or significantly degraded for more than 15 consecutive minutes. | Service Credit equivalent to 15% of monthly service fee for each full 30-minute interval of Unplanned Downtime exceeding 15 minutes per month. |
Service Components
- Bid submission and intake processing.
- Automated technical compliance checks based on predefined criteria.
- Manual review and scoring of technical aspects.
- Generation of compliance scores and evaluation reports.
- Secure storage and access to bid documentation.
In-Depth Guidance
Frequently Asked Questions
Phase 02: Execution
Ready when you are
Let's scope your Bid Evaluation & Technical Compliance Scoring Service in Zambia project in Zambia.
OEM Approved
54Regions
Scaling healthcare logistics and technical systems across the entire continent.